Back

Descriptions of Selected Fishery Landings and Estimates of Recreational Party and Charter Vessel Revenue from Areas: A Planning-level Assessment


Prepared by:
National Marine Fisheries Service


July 06, 2021





Data sources:
Recreational fisheries landings data from vessel trip reports (VTR) for vessels issued a party/charter permit and marine angler expenditure surveys


In order to meet requirements of maintaining data confidentiality, these strata are presented individually. In addition, records that did not meet the rule of three ( >= 3 unique permits), values were summarized as ‘All Others’.

Some caveats/notes:

  • Values are reported in nominal dollars. Values in 2019 dollars are reported as well (see below for details).
  • Landings are reported in number of fish kept on party/charter trips.
  • The term “angler trips” refers to the number of reported passengers on party/charter VTRs.
  • The party/charter VTRs contain some trips where no fish were landed. Although these trips do not contribute to the species summaries, they are included in the activity summaries of trips, angler trips, and revenues.
  • The term “vessel trips” refers to the number of party/charter VTRs submitted to NMFS where landings of any species were recorded.
  • Data summarized here are based on federal VTRs submitted to NMFS.
  • Numbers of individual fish species landed on party/charter trips are summarized by management categories as follows:
    • Northeast Multispecies; Bluefish; Mackerel, Squid, Butterfish; Golden and Blueline Tilefish; Summer Flounder, Scup, Black Sea Bass: Individual New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council FMPs that require a party/charter permit
    • Other Federal FMPs: Individual New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council FMPs that do not require a party/charter permit and have no recreational measures (Atlantic herring, Atlantic Sea Scallops, Monkfish, Spiny Dogfish, Skates, Red Crab, and Surfclams and Ocean Quahogs)
    • Atlantic HMS FMP: Atlantic billfish, Atlantic tunas, swordfish and sharks
    • ASMFC Interstate FMPs: Species managed exclusively under an ASMFC ISFMP (American Lobster, Atlantic Croaker, Cobia, Red Drum, Black Drum Spanish Mackerel, Spot, striped Bass, Spotted Sea Trout, Tautog, Weakfish and Coastal Sharks)
    • No Federal Plan: Species that are not managed under any Federal or ASMFC ISFMP
  • VTR data with missing coordinates have been removed.


References
DePiper GS (2014) Statistically assessing the precision of self-reported VTR fishing locations.
Benjamin S, Lee MY, DePiper G. 2018. Visualizing fishing data as rasters. NEFSC Ref Doc 18-12; 24 p.



Most Impacted Species By Management Category

The table below indicates the total number of fish kept from the area by Management Categories. The category “All Others” refers to categories with less than three permits impacted to protect data confidentiality.


Figure 1.1 Fish Count of Top Categories, Beacon Wind

Table 1.1 Management Categories Fish Count, Beacon Wind
Management Categories Eleven Year Fish Count
All Others 3,561
Total 3,561



Most Impacted Species

We analyzed the top species most frequently kept on recreational party/charter trips in the area and to isolate them from combined FMPs. The top species by the total number of fish kept are: and All Others . The category “All Others” refers to species with less than three permits impacted to protect data confidentiality.


Figure 2.1 Fish Count of Top Species, Beacon Wind

Table 2.1 Fish Count, Most Impacted Species, Beacon Wind
Species Eleven Year Fish Count
All Others 3,561
Total 3,561



Total Party/Charter Activity by Year

We analyzed the total revenue of party/charter trips by year by multiplying the annual mean combined charter and party for-hire fee of each state by the total number of anglers for each year. (See Methods section) Revenue values have been deflated to 2019 dollars. Suppressed years have been set to 0 for the total.


Table 3.1 Total Party/Charter Revenue by Year, Beacon Wind

Year Annual Revenue
2008 Suppressed
2009 Suppressed
2010 Suppressed
2011 Suppressed
2012 Suppressed
2013 No Trips
2014 No Trips
2015 No Trips
2016 Suppressed
2017 No Trips
2018 No Trips
Total $0



Number of Vessel Trips by Port

The table below indicate the total number of trips within the area by year and port. The category “Other Ports, XX” refers to ports with less than three permits to protect data confidentiality.


Table 4.1 Total Number of Vessel Trips by Port and Year, Beacon Wind

Port 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Other Ports, MA 2 1 1 7 1 0 0 0 6 0 0
Other Ports, RI 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Ports, NY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0



Number of Angler Trips by Port

The table below indicate the total number of angler trips from the area by year and port. The category “Other Ports, XX” refers to ports with less than three permits to protect data confidentiality.


Table 4.2 Total Number of Angler Trips by Port and Year, Beacon Wind

Port 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Other Ports, MA 5 4 2 42 5 0 0 0 13 0 0
Other Ports, RI 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Ports, NY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0



Percentage of Angler Trips by Permit

We also analyzed the percentage of each permit’s total angler trips coming from within Beacon Wind area (see boxplot figure and table below). Boxplots are important statistical summaries because they provide information about the distribution of the percentages. The boxplots below begin at the 1st quartile, or the value beneath which 25 percent of all observations fall. A thick line within the box identifies the median, the observation at which 50 percent of observations are above or beneath. The box ends at the 3rd quartile, or the observation beneath which 75 percent of observations fall. Nonparametric estimates of the minimum and maximum values are also indicated by the “whiskers” (dashed line terminating in a vertical line) that jut out from each side of the box. Any points outside of these whiskers are observations that are considered outliers. In our table , however, the maximum values are inclusive of outliers. The table below presents the minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, and maximum values for the area. These are the eleven year angler trip percentages. The boxplot in the figure below further separate the area out by year.


Table 5.1 Eleven Year Summary of Permit Angler Trip Revenue Percent, Beacon Wind

Area Min 1st Quartile Median 3rd Quartile Max
Beacon Wind 0.64% 2% 3% 8% 29%


Figure 5.1 Annual Permit Angler Trip Percentage Boxplots, Beacon Wind



Species Dependence

The tables below indicate party/charter vessel and angler trips, occurring within the area of interest, as a percentage of totals generated by party/charter vessel and angler trips across the entire region by year and the top species deriving the most fish kept from the area by year. The category “All Others” refers to species with less than three permits impacted to protect data confidentiality.


Table 6.1 Annual Party Vessel Trips, Angler Trips, and Number of Vessels in the Beacon Wind, as a Percent of Total Northeast Region Party/Charter
Year Vessel Trips as % of Total Angler Trips as % of Total Number of Vessels as % of Total
2008 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2009 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2010 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2011 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2012 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2013 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2014 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2015 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2016 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2017 No Trips No Trips No Trips
2018 No Trips No Trips No Trips
Table 6.2 Eleven Year Total Fish Count for Top Species as a Percent of Total, Beacon Wind
Species Fish Count as % of Total
All Others 18.06


Methods

NOAA Fisheries conducted their first marine angler expenditure survey in 1998 (Steinback and Gentner 2001; Gentner, Price, and Steinback 2001). Additional surveys were conducted in 2006 (Gentner, Price, and Steinback 2008), 2011 (Lovell Steinback, and Hilger 2013), and 2017 (Lovell et al 2020). For-hire passenger fee data collected from these surveys provided the baseline for calculating average annual fees by region/state from 1997 to 2019.

Linear extrapolation was used to estimate average for-hire fees for years with no survey data. For example, in Steinback and Gentner (2001), the average for-hire fee in Maine in 1998 was $46.20. The next angler expenditure survey, conducted in 2006, found the average for-hire fee in Maine was $63.65 (see Gentner, Price, and Steinback 2008). To calculate average fees for the years between 1998 and 2006 we simply extrapolated linearly between the two known data points. This same procedure was used to extrapolate values for all years between the four survey years.

Average for-hire fees in 1997, the year preceding the first survey, and in the two years following the last survey (2018 and 2019), were calculated using industry specific Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) output deflators. Specifically, we used BEA output deflators shown for Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries (North American Industry Classification System code 713000), which include recreational fishing guide services. Nominal values were converted to 2019 dollars using the same BEA output deflators.

For further information email Scott Steinback, Economist, NOAA Fisheries, Northeast Fisheries Science Center ().

Steinback, S. and B. Gentner. 2001. “Marine Angler Expenditures in the Northeast Region, 1998”. U.S. Dept. of Commerce. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-47. Gentner, B., M. Price, and S. Steinback. 2001. “Marine Angler Expenditures in the Southeast Region, 2001”. U.S. Dept. of Commerce. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-48 Gentner, Brad, and Scott Steinback. 2008. The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States, 2006.U.S. Dep. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-94, 301 p. Lovell, Sabrina, Scott Steinback, and James Hilger. 2013. The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States, 2011. U.S. Dep. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-134, 188 p.  Lovell, Sabrina, James Hilger, Emily Rollins, Noelle A. Olsen, and Scott Steinback. 2020. The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures on Fishing Trips in the United States, 2017. U.S. Dep. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-201, 80 p.